March 2nd, 2014


(no subject)

В Керчи вчера ночью русские окружили батальон морской пехоты (ВЧ-А0669) и заслали парламентера с требованием открыть ворота, дабы охранять вооружение, чтобы не досталось экстремистам. Парламентера заверили, что с охраной все замечательно и выставили из части:

В Феодосии часть морской пехоты тоже послала русских, но там, похоже, хуже - там под стенами толпа казаков, которые выдвинули некий ультиматум и пообещали штурм части:
А это, если случится, уже повод русским завопить "бандеры в русских стреляют" и перейти к горячей фазе.

P.S. Казаки русские, позавчера вместе (и под руководством?) русских же в камуфляже приперлись в Керчь из-за пролива, сбор был в Комсомольском парке в Войково, устроили вчера митинг с подъемом русского флага на площади Ленина с раздачей колорадских ленточек и рванули на Феодосию.
Да, и официально припершиеся именуются паломниками:

Газ и Европа — доклад для Конгресса

Оригинал взят у fregimus в Газ и Европа — доклад для Конгресса
Доклад исследовательской службы Конгресса США о состоянии газовых дел в Европе, и о возможностях диверсификации газового снабжения, чтобы меньше зависеть от одного поставщика.

Таблички, карты, все разжевано и разложено по полочкам в небольшом 20-страничном отчете, понятном даже простому депутату Конгресса. Занимательнейшее чтение.

Ratner, M., et. al. (2013) Europe's Energy Security: Options and Challenges to Natural Gas Supply Diversification. Congressional Research Service R42405-1. Washington, DC.

A key element of the EU’s energy supply strategy has been to shift to a greater use of natural gas. Europe as a whole is a major importer of natural gas. Although second to Norway as a supplier to Europe, Russia remains one of Europe’s most important natural gas suppliers. Europe’s natural gas consumption is projected to grow while its own domestic natural gas production continues to decline. If trends continue as projected, Europe’s dependence on Russia as a supplier is likely to grow. And, while it could be in Europe’s interest to explore alternative sources for its natural gas needs, it is uncertain whether Europe as a whole can, or is willing to, replace a significant level of imports from Russia. Some European countries that feel vulnerable to potential Russian energy supply manipulation may work harder to achieve diversification than others.

Russia has not been idle when it comes to protecting its share of the European natural gas market. Moscow, including the state-controlled company Gazprom, has attempted to stymie European-backed alternatives to pipelines it controls by proposing competing pipeline projects and attempting to co-opt European companies by offering them stakes in those and other пrojects. It has attempted to dissuade potential suppliers (especially those in Central Asia) from participating in European-supported plans. Moscow has also raised environmental concerns in an apparent effort to hinder other alternatives to its supplies, such as unconventional natural gas…

This report focuses on potential approaches that Europe might employ to diversify its sources of natural gas supply, Russia’s role in Europe’s natural gas policies, and key factors that could hinder efforts to develop alternative suppliers of natural gas. The report assesses the potential suppliers of natural gas to Europe and the short- to medium-term hurdles needed to be overcome for those suppliers to be credible, long-term providers of natural gas to Europe. The report looks at North Africa, potentially the most realistic supply alternative in the near term, but notes that the region will have to resolve its current political, economic, and security instability as well as the internal structural changes to the natural gas industry. Central Asia, which may have the greatest amounts of natural gas, would need to construct lengthy pipelines through multiple countries to move its natural gas to Europe.